Cases 1 - 10 of 76
Thomas et al v. (EZ) Moonwalk Renter & More et al
as 4:2024cv00946
Plaintiff:
Balazkie R Thomas and Larenz Parker
Defendant:
(EZ) Moonwalk Renter & More, (EZ) Insurance Services LLC and Liberty Mutual Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Eze et al v. Lunsford
as 2:2023cv00976
Plaintiff:
Paulette Eze and Pamela Eze Sylvestre
Defendant:
Brad Lunsford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Mall v. Binkley et al
as 2:2023cv02240
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Mall
Defendant:
Rob Binkley doing business as EZ Homes Incorporated, Scott E Williams doing business as Zona Law Group, Tiffany & Bosco PA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv12191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv02979
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00523
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv00250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01548
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022at00914
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Chambers v. EZ Choice, Inc.
as 8:2022cv02001
Plaintiff:
Delroy A. Chambers, Jr.
Defendant:
EZ Choice, Inc. doing business as EZ Choice Realty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
