Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Wamser et al v. Wyoming Department of Corrections Former Director et al
as 2:2020cv00173
Defendant: Wyoming Department of Corrections Former Director, Wyoming Department of Corrections Honor Farm Warden, Wyoming Department of Corrections Interim Director and others
Plaintiff: Tammy Wamser and Frank Wamser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOUNTAIN v. DOZIER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2020cv00406
Defendant: CURTIS CARTER, CAPTAIN MARK AGBAOSI, CAPTAIN THOMAS F SUMPTER and others
Plaintiff: BRENDA MOUNTAIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. United States of America et al
as 2:2019cv01239
Defendant: John Doe #2, Office of Internal Affairs, John Doe #1, Special Agent, Office of the Inspector General, Michael Carvajal, Former Regional Director, Northeast Region, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Plaintiff: Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1456
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Moya, et al v. Garcia, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-2037
Plaintiff - Appellant: LONNIE PETRY, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and MARIANO MOYA
Defendant - Appellee: ROBERT GARCIA, Santa Fe County Sheriff, MARK CALDWELL, Warden of Santa Fe County Adult Correctional Facility, MARK GALLEGOS, former Warden Santa Fe County Adult Correctional Facility, in their individual capacities and others
Sirica Bumpus v. Harrell Watts, et al
as 15-11846
Plaintiff - Appellant: SIRICA BUMPUS
Defendant - Appellee: HARRELL WATTS, administrator for national inmate appeals, G. DUNCAN, a unit manager, WARDEN and others
Dana West v. Susan Murphy We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-2014
Plaintiff - Appellant: DANA T. WEST, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, ANTHONY HAIG, GARY SAUNDERS and others
Plaintiff: ERIC JONES, KEVIN ADAMS, TONIA BOWIE and others
Defendant - Appellee: SUSAN MURPHY, former Warden, Baltimore Central Booking and Intake Center, individually and in her official capacity and WILLIAM JEDNORSKI, former Warden, Baltimore Central Booking and Intake Center, individually and in his official capacity
Defendant: CITY OF BALTIMORE, BALTIMORE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE
Turkmen v. Ashcroft
as 13-1662
Plaintiff: Asif-Ur-Rehman Saffi, Syed Amjad Ali Jaffri, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Akil Sachveda and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: Ibrahim Turkmen, Akhil Sachdeva, Anser Mehmood and others
Defendant - Appellee: John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Robert Mueller, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigations, James W. Ziglar, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service and others
Intervenor: Omer Gavriel Marmari, Yaron Shmuel, Paul Kurzberg and others
Turkmen v. Ashcroft
as 13-1002
Plaintiff - Appellee: Ibrahim Turkmen, Asif-Ur-Rehman Saffi, Syed Amjad Ali Jaffri, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant: John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Robert Mueller, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigations, James W. Ziglar, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service and others
Intervenor: Omer Gavriel Marmari, Yaron Shmuel, Paul Kurzberg and others
Defendant - Appellant: Michael Zenk, Warden of the Metropolitan Detention Center
Turkmen v. Ashcroft
as 13-999
Plaintiff - Appellee: Ibrahim Turkmen, Asif-Ur-Rehman Saffi, Syed Amjad Ali Jaffri, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant: John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Robert Mueller, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigations, James W. Ziglar, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service and others
Intervenor: Omer Gavriel Marmari, Yaron Shmuel, Paul Kurzberg and others
Defendant - Appellant: James Sherman

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?