Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Camp v. Oxford General Partner
as 1:2023cv03319
Plaintiff:
Shawn Camp
Defendant:
Oxford General Partner doing business as Oxford Club Spa & Salon, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
Caplan v. OMNI AUCTION CORP. et al
as 0:2023cv62030
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Defendant:
OMNI AUCTION CORP. and SEVILLE GENERAL PARTNERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00552
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2455
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00509
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv08916
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01704
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 lm Removal- Labor/Mgmt. Relations
Lombard v. City of North Richland Hills Police Department et al
as 4:2022cv00784
Plaintiff:
Wilton Irvon Lombard, Jr. and Wilton Irvon Lombard, Jr
Defendant:
City of North Richland Hills Police Department, Mayor Oscar Trevino of North Richland Hills, Snow Heights North, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01557
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
