Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Smith et al v. Hutchinson et al
as 3:2019cv00082
Defendant:
Sylvia Wear, Cindy Gillespie, Alfred Hogan and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Louise Smith and Tiffany E Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00518
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Anderson v. National Park Community College and Board of Trustees of National Park Community College et al
as 6:2014cv06141
Plaintiff:
Drecarlos Anderson
Defendant:
National Park Community College and Board of Trustees of National Park Community College , William Ritter and John Hogan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gabrielle v. Hogan et al
as 5:2012cv05263
Plaintiff:
Sabrina Gabrielle
Defendant:
Nathan Hogan and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Whitehead v. Clinton et al
as 4:2011cv04031
Plaintiff:
David Louis Whitehead
Defendant:
William Jefferson Clinton, George W. Bush, Barrack H. Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hogans v. Sallas et al
as 1:2010cv00005
Plaintiff:
Lori Hogans
Defendant:
David Sallas, Mike Munday, Robert Riggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Hogan v. BG Excelsior Limited Partnership
as 4:2008cv00122
Plaintiff:
Juanita Hogan
Defendant:
BG Excelsior Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2007cv00108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv00235
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
