Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Brud Rossmann v. Linda Sapin, et al
as 24-5009
Plaintiff:
Brud Rossmann, Esquire
Defendant:
Linda Sapin, Ph.D, Philip Pulaski, MD, John Maxwell Finland and others
ROSSMANN v. SAPIN et al
as 1:2023cv03123
Plaintiff:
BRUD ROSSMANN
Defendant:
LINDA SAPIN, PHILIP PULASKI, JOHN MAXWELL FINLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00631
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Holeman v. The Federal Bureau of Investigation
as 2:2016cv00174
Plaintiff:
Jacob Holeman
Defendant:
The Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Donetta Byrd v. Superior Court for the Distri, et al
as 15-7163
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Donetta Byrd
Defendant - Appellee:
Superior Court for the District of Columbia, Civil Division and Brian Holeman, Judge
BYRD v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2015cv01949
Plaintiff:
DONETTA BYRD
Defendant:
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and BRIAN F. HOLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Holeman et al v. Oklahoma City Independent School District No 89 of Oklahoma County et al
as 5:2011cv00394
Plaintiff:
Carrie Holeman and Henry Holeman
Defendant:
Oklahoma City Independent School District No 89 of Oklahoma County , Jane Doe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00693
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Ziad Akl v. Brian Holeman, et al
as 10-7072
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ziad Akl, MD
Defendant - Appellee:
Brian Holeman, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLP, Patrick J. Potter and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
