Cases 1 - 10 of 105
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2019
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1996
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Michael Bradley v. OH Ethics Comm, et al
as 23-3876
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL W. BRADLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
OHIO ETHICS COMMISSION, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR PAUL M. NICK, Ohio Ethics Commission, CHAIRMAN MEROM BRACHMAN, Ohio Ethics Commission and others
Wu v. Davis et al
as 2:2023cv01362
Plaintiff:
Pak Keung Wu
Defendant:
Tracy Hope Davis and Kimberly J. Husted
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1595
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Husted v. Shibley
as 5:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
Amanda M. Husted
Defendant:
Lee Shibley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bradley v. Ohio Ethics Commission et al.
as 2:2023cv00024
Plaintiff:
Michael W Bradley
Defendant:
Ohio Ethics Commission, Executive Director Paul M Nick, Chairman Merom Brachman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00638
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Clervrain et al v. Madden et al
as 5:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Ronaldo Jean, Brandko, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Madden, Jon Husted, Dave Yost and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
