Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Estate of Jaquyn O'Neill Light v. Marcus Pollock
as 24-1473
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF JAQUYN O'NEILL LIGHT, by and through James Hunt Johnson, Administrator
Defendant:
MARCUS POLLOCK, in his individual and official capacities, JEFF PRITCHARD, in his official capacities and CITY OF GRAHAM, a political subdivision of the State of North Carolina
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00522
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hunt v. Bronx Lebanon Hospital
as 22-1895
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Hunt
Defendant / Appellee:
Bronx Lebanon Hospital and Local Union 1199, SEIU
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02693
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Hunt v. Bronx Lebanon Hospital et al
as 1:2022cv00054
Plaintiff:
James Hunt
Defendant:
Bronx Lebanon Hospital and Local Union 1199, SEIU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nicholson v. County of Westchester et al
as 7:2021cv01484
Defendant:
PAUL OSTERMAN, County of Westchester, NICHOLAS ZEBROWSKI and others
Plaintiff:
ROMAINE NICHOLSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nicholson v. County Of Westchester et al
as 7:2021cv01483
Defendant:
PAUL OSTERMAN, County Of Westchester, NICHOLAS ZEBROWSKI and others
Plaintiff:
ROMAINE NICHOLSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv03448
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00247
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Kendrick v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2020cv03871
Defendant:
Officer James Hunt, #1442, City Of Chicago and Officer Vincenzo Lupo, #10401
Plaintiff:
Timothy Kendrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
