Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Josie v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv02476
Plaintiff:
Mike Josie
Defendant:
The City of New York, Detective Brian M. Doyle, Police Officer James M. Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
HABAYEB v. BUTLER et al
as 1:2015cv05107
Plaintiff:
EDWARD HABAYEB
Defendant:
SHAUN BUTLER, KRISTA SHIELDS, BRIAN HAUSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sadi et al v. Obama et al
as 2:2015cv11314
Plaintiff:
Rashid Mohamed Sadi , Jaber Mohamed Alsaady , Jane Doe No. 1 and others
Defendant:
Barack Hussein Obama , John F Kerry , Ash Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703
Guichardo et al v. Hanson et al
as 1:2015cv00585
Defendant:
Tony Abreu, Jon Aceto, Christopher W. Alexander and others
Plaintiff:
Carmen C. Guichardo, Elido A. Guichardo, Elijah J. Guichardo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv05061
Defendant:
248 Madison Street Housing Development Fund Corporation, P.O. Jeffrey Augustin, Margaret D. Blow and others
The Names John And Jane Doe Being Fictitious, As The True Names Are Presently Unknown:
John Doe and Jane Doe #1-16
Plaintiff:
Latisha Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phipps v. Bialczak et al
as 4:2012cv00554
Plaintiff:
Lataya Phipps
Defendant:
William A. Bialczak , Kenneth J. Bialczak , S & H Parking System, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
COLLAZO v. THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER et al
as 5:2010cv07010
Plaintiff:
MARIA LISA COLLAZO
Defendant:
THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER , LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON BOARD , LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAMPBELL v. SALEM COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2008cv00270
Plaintiff:
DENISE CAMPBELL
Defendant:
SALEM COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, COUNTY OF SALEM, FORTINO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
