Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Moore v. Frazier et al
as 2:2021cv04134
Plaintiff:
Sandra M Moore
Defendant:
Sheriff Tedd E. Frazier, Sergeant Scott Conley, Aldan Mapes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chowdhury et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2021cv00962
Defendant:
DERMOT SHEA, KERRY PLAWIAK, CITY OFNEW YORK and others
Plaintiff:
Shaiful Chowdhury and JOHN 1-20 DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Greenup et al v. Morris et al
as 4:2019cv00243
Defendant:
Richard Armstrong, John 1-20 Does, Elizabeth Loosli and others
Plaintiff:
Jane 1-20 Does, Danielle Greenup, Darce Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-56922
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
CHANDLER v. FORSYTH TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE, ET AL.
as 1:2015cv00337
Plaintiff:
HANNAH CHANDLER
Defendant:
FORSYTH TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE, NANCY RAPP, WARREN HODGES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Hunt, et al v. City of Cleveland, et al
as 13-3898
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES D HUNT and MERYLIN M. CONARD
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CLEVELAND, JOHN M. KIGGINS, CITY OF EAST CLEVELAND and others
Topsoils, Inc. et al v. Snohomish County et al
as 2:2010cv01148
Plaintiff:
Topsoils, Inc. and Daniel P. McAuliffe
Defendant:
Snohomish County , Bernard Myers , Jane Doe Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gordon et al v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2009cv05070
Plaintiff:
Marcos Gordon, Marcos Gordon, Phyllis Gordon and others
Defendant:
State of Washington, Andrew Phillips, Edward L Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sayegh et al v. Ram et al
as 7:2007cv08048
Plaintiff:
Diana R. Sayegh, Anthony Matias, Marlene Heslop and others
Defendant:
Wendy Ram, Philip Amicone, Edmund Hartnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
