Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00868
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
B & L Productions, Inc. et al v. 22nd District Agricultural Association et al
as 3:2019cv00134
Plaintiff:
Christopher Irick, South Bay Rod and Gun Club, Inc., B & L Productions, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Karen Hill, Richard Valdez, 22nd District Agricultural Association and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv
Karen Hill v. Financial Care of Wabash Valle, et al
as 16-1856
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAREN HILL
Defendant - Appellee:
FINANCIAL CARE OF WABASH VALLEY, INC., MARY LEDFORD, MARY J. HOELLER, in her official and individual capacities as Probate Guardian Ad Litem and others
Karen Hill v. Gerald Zore, et al
as 16-1839
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAREN HILL
Defendant - Appellee:
GERALD ZORE, MARY J. HOELLER, in her official and individual capacities as Probate Guardian Ad Litem, FINANCIAL CARE OF WABASH VALLEY, INC. and others
Karen Hill v. Gerald Zore, et al
as 15-1705
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAREN HILL, RONALD G. DAWSON (deceased)
Defendant - Appellee:
GERALD ZORE, in his official and individual capacities as Marion Co. Sup. Court Judge, FINANCIAL CARE OF WABASH VALLEY, INC., MARK BATTIS, in his official and individual capacities as Marion Co. Probate Court Commissioner and others
HILL v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2012cv01595
Defendant:
ADULT PROTECTIVE SERVICES, B & B CHRISTIAN HEALTHCARE NURSING HOME, FRANCES BARROW and others
Plaintiff:
KAREN HILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Pettus v. City of New York
as 11-4690
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Lamont Pettus
Defendant - Appellee:
City of New York, Joseph Lamassa, AKA Joseph Camassa, Marianna Lowenfeld and others
Pettus v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv01442
Defendant:
Richard Boye, Joseph Camassa, Jhon Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
