Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv01005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Pilcher v. The City of Acworth, Georgia et al
as 1:2018cv03968
Defendant:
Nicholas Gottfried, Kyle Bayfield, Michael Ayers and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel C. Pilcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00242
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Undetermined:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
William Adams v. Gregory Stokes, et al
as 16-16669
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM ADAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
GREGORY STOKES, Police Officer and KENNETH KING
Gifford v. Hornbrook Community Services District, et al
as 2:2015cv01274
Plaintiff:
Roger Gifford
Defendant:
Hornbrook Community Services District, Michele Hanson, Patricia Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv10075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
King v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv04311
Defendant:
Richard A. Brown, City of New York, Barry Frankenstein and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
William Adams v. City of Ormond Beach, et al
as 11-11792
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM ADAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF ORMOND BEACH, a municipal corporation, JOHN DOE NETTERVILE, Badge #51, police officer, GREGORY STOKES, police officer and others
Blanton v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2009cv01832
Plaintiff:
David Blanton
Defendant:
County of Sacramento, Sacramento County Sheriff's Department, Chris Bittle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
