Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01692
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Maldonado v. Town of Cottonwood et al
as 1:2021cv00645
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Maldonado
Defendant:
Town of Cottonwood, Tony Money and Jim L. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Barber v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 2:2016cv01321
Plaintiff:
Donald Joe Barber
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, John Koskinen, Rebecca Kline and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrett et al v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 2:2016cv01247
Plaintiff:
Aubrey Maurice Garrett, Paul Edward Trull, Jr, Kimberly Dawn Trull and others
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, John Koskinen, Rebecca Kline and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong et al v. Boaz, City of et al
as 4:2016cv01065
Plaintiff:
Robin Zak Armstrong and Timothy-Brian Armstrong
Defendant:
Boaz, City of , Tim Walker , Danny L Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv03493
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Smith v. Reebals et al
as 4:2009cv00937
Plaintiff:
Danny L Smith
Defendant:
Mike Reebals, Mark Carney, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv01349
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01819
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01691
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
