Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Nicholls v. Floyd County, Georgia et al
as 4:2023cv00122
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Edward Nicholls
Defendant:
Floyd County, Georgia, City of Rome, Georgia, Lt. Christopher Hovers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06665
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
MAYFIELD v. PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY/PPA et al
as 2:2022cv01642
Plaintiff:
KARIM MAYFIELD
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY/PPA, ELIZABETH A. CRADDOCK, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Toon et al v. Zerkle et al
as 2:2021cv00427
Plaintiff:
Mark Toon and Eric Toon
Defendant:
Lt. Christopher K. Zerkle, Sgt. Paxton Lively, Sgt. Rick Keglor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quinn v. Zerkle et al
as 2:2021cv00421
Plaintiff:
Taylor Quinn
Defendant:
Lt. Christopher K. Zerkle, Sgt. Paxton Lively, Sgt. Rick Keglor and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Mark Toon and Eric Toon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vonville v. Luthcke et al
as 3:2020cv02446
Defendant:
Jessica Ladd, Tamhannock Township, Detective Craig Vanlouvender and others
Plaintiff:
Philip Joseph Vonville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Defendini v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv05822
Defendant:
NYPD LT Christopher Bannon, NYPD SGT Fialo, NYPD P.O. Raymond Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
Nitetel Defendini
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tiger v. Jason Pynkala, et al
as 15-5103
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIGER
Defendant - Appellee:
JASON S. PYNKALA, Officer, Individually, CAMRON S. BRIGGS, Officer, Individually, LT. CHRISTOPHER MOFFATT, Individually and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv03568
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
