Cases 1 - 10 of 894
Konan v. Saydah et al
as 6:2024cv00886
Plaintiff:
Raymond Konan
Defendant:
Neil A. Saydah and Saydah Law Firm
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-11548
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Marquez v. Baker-Chavez et al
as 1:2024cv00423
Plaintiff:
Antoinette Marquez
Defendant:
Amber Baker-Chavez, Elizabeth O-Rourke, Gerard Lavelle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pal v. Tallberg et al
as 3:2024cv00792
Plaintiff:
Neelu Pal
Defendant:
James N Tallberg, Andrew J Glass, Patrick D Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jeremy Dunn, et al v. Shane Penfield, et al
as 24-1804
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Dunn and Kevin Love
Defendant:
Shane Penfield, in his official and individual capacities, Penfield Law Firm Professional LLC, Marty Jackley, in his individual capacity and others
Bryant v. McLean, et al
as 24-1123
Plaintiff:
JAMUS ORAN BRYANT
Defendant:
BONNIE HEATHER MCLEAN, in her official and individual capacities, CHRISTINA APOSTOLI, in her official and individual capacities, FRANK ANTHONY MOSCHETTI, in his official and individual capacities and others
Dimitar Petlechkov v. Michael Stengel, et al
as 24-5254
Plaintiff:
DIMITAR PETLECHKOV
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. STENGEL, dba Stengel Law Firm, P.C. and STENGEL LAW FIRM, P.C.
Dwight II v. Calderon
as 8:2024cv00722
Plaintiff:
Harold D. Dwight II
Defendant:
Liz E. Calderon, Judge Brenda Ramirez and Attorney Echemendia Law Firm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tanser v. White & Case Law Firm et al
as 1:2024cv02153
Plaintiff:
Julie Irene Tanser
Defendant:
White & Case Law Firm, Isaac Glassman and Arziki M. Adamu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
