Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Locust v. Stroud et al
as 4:2017cv00110
Plaintiff:
Elder Deforrorra Locust
Defendant:
Don F. Stroud, R. L. Daughty and O. C.G. Leroy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00954
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McCollum, et al. v. Robeson County, et al.-
as 4:2015cv00141
Defendant:
Robeson County, Town of Red Springs, Kenneth Sealey and others
Plaintiff:
Henry Lee McCollum and Leon Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCollum, et al. v. Robeson County, et al.
as 5:2015cv00451
Defendant:
Robeson County , Town of Red Springs , Kenneth Sealey and others
Plaintiff:
Henry Lee McCollum and Leon Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patten et al v. Williams et al
as 4:2015cv00085
Plaintiff:
Thomas Patten , Leslie Teachey , Ryan Turner and others
Defendant:
Cedric Williams, North Carolina Department of Public Safety, Frank L. Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00954
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
ASSA'AD-FALTAS v. CARTER et al
as 1:2014cv00678
Plaintiff:
MARIE-THERESE H. ASSA'AD-FALTAS, MD
Defendant:
TANDY CARTER, BARBARA JEAN BURNS, SARA HEATHER SAVITZ WEISS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Assa'ad-Faltas v. Regional Postal Inspector et al
as 3:2012cv00463
Plaintiff:
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas
Defendant:
Regional Postal Inspector, Office of Citizenship and Immigration Services, US Patents and Trademark Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
