Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Brown v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv10773
Defendant:
Sheriff Thomas Dart, Cook County and Cook County Sheriff's Office
Plaintiff:
Linda Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04969
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Cantu, et al. v. Kings County, et al.
as 1:2020cv00538
Plaintiff:
Linda Brown, Roger Cantu and G. C.
Defendant:
Kings County Sheriff Department, David Robinson, NaphCare, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cantu et al v. Kings County et al
as 1:2020at00275
Plaintiff:
Linda Brown, Roger Cantu and G. C.
Defendant:
Kings County Sheriff Department, David Robinson, NaphCare, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01627
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
CARISTO v. BLAIRSVILLE-SALTSBURG SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2018cv00976
Defendant:
HOLLY HALL, MARLENE JOYCE, MICHAEL BARTOLINI and others
Plaintiff:
TAMMY CARISTO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01854
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elloitt et al v. QF Circa 37, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00288
Plaintiff:
Natsue Elloitt and Linda Brown
Defendant:
QF Circa 37, LLC, Versa CIC, L.P. and ConAm Management Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Thompson v. Board Of Education City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2014cv06838
Plaintiff:
Mark Thompson
Defendant:
Board Of Education City Of Chicago , Harold Ardell , Linda Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
