Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Rashall Brackney-Wheelock v. City of Charlottesville
as 23-1129
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RASHALL M. BRACKNEY-WHEELOCK, Ph.D.
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, CHARLES BOYLES, a/k/a Chip, Former City Manager with Charlottesville, LISA ROBERTSON, City Attorney and others
Brackney-Wheelock v. City of Charlottesville et al
as 3:2022cv00035
Defendant:
Charles Boyles, Latroy Durrette, City of Charlottesville and others
Plaintiff:
Rashall M. Brackney-Wheelock, Ph.D.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Robles, et al v. United States, et al
as 22-3017
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GABRIEL M. ROBLES and BONNIE ROBLES
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, LOUIS DEJOY, Postmaster General, DEREK SCHMIDT, Attorney General, State of Kansas and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Robles et al v. United States of America et al
as 5:2021cv04047
Plaintiff:
Gabriel M. Robles and Bonnie Robles
Defendant:
United States of America, Louis Dejoy, Derek Schmidt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 19-14895
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-15548
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-13053
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv24624
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00526
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
