Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Gosselin v. Jones
as 5:2023cv00723
Plaintiff:
Marcel John Gosselin
Defendant:
Michael A Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00987
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00661
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
Jones v. Tate Rehmet Law Office et al
as 3:2023cv00462
Plaintiff:
Michael Darnell Jones
Defendant:
Tate Rehmet Law Office and J Bart Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Santoyo et al
as 3:2022cv01911
Plaintiff:
Michael D Jones
Defendant:
Guillermo Santoyo, Jr, Joel Gonzalez, Allstate Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jones v. Tate Rehmet Law Office et al
as 3:2022cv01905
Plaintiff:
Michael D Jones
Defendant:
Tate Rehmet Law Office and J Bart Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Code Enforcement Business et al
as 3:2022cv01907
Plaintiff:
Michael Darnell Jones
Defendant:
Code Enforcement Business, Stacey Graves, The MacFarlane Firm PC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Gorman et al
as 3:2022cv01875
Plaintiff:
Michael Darnell Jones
Defendant:
Esther Gorman, Gene Gorman, Code Enforcement Cedar Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01680
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Drake v. Mercedes Benz USA, LLC. et al
as 3:2021cv00251
Plaintiff:
Eric Drake and Eric *DO NOT FILE* Drake
Defendant:
Mercedes Benz USA, LLC., Best Buy Co., Inc., Corie Barry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
