Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Hopkins v. The State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Rosie Hopkins
Defendant:
The State of North Carolina, Department of Health and Human Service Health Care Registry, Villages of Apex Club and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Willis v. Myers et al
as 4:2021cv00125
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Willis
Defendant:
Richard E. Myers, II, Louise W. Flanagan, Malcolm J. Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hopkins v. The State of North Carolina et al
as 4:2021cv00087
Defendant:
Stella Hays, Gloria Alerez-Rothrock, Keith Gregory and others
Plaintiff:
Rosie Hopkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00398
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sorensson v. Harbor Freight Tools USA Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv00166
Defendant:
Tanya Newton, Dante Unknon Last Name, Karen Thomas and others
Plaintiff:
Karolina Sorensson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Sharpe v. Winterville Police Department et al
as 4:2019cv00157
Defendant:
Winterville Police Department, Myers Parker Helms, IV and William Blake Ellis
Plaintiff:
Dijon Sharpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Stanley et al
as 7:2019cv00195
Defendant:
mr. David Stanley, Brunswick County, Ms. cathy lytch and others
Plaintiff:
Ms. Sandra Hewett Brooks and Sandra Hewett Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00991
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1514 A
Brooks v. Stanley et al
as 7:2018cv00128
Defendant:
David Stanley, Patricia Myers and Cathy Lytch
Plaintiff:
Sandra Hewett Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
