Cases 1 - 10 of 204
Jackson v. Unnamed Present and Former Members of the District Attorney's Office for Clark County, Nevada Family Support Division
as 2:2024cv00941
Plaintiff:
Myles Stanley Jackson
Defendant:
Unnamed Present and Former Members of the District Attorney's Office for Clark County, Nevada Family Support Division
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Myles v. Walmart, et al
as 24-3038
Plaintiff:
BRACEY MYLES and ALFREDA LANG
Defendant:
WALMART, INC., DBA Walmart Supercenter #378 and WALMART DE
Myles v. Walmart, et al
as 24-3026
Plaintiff:
BRACEY MYLES and ALFREDA LANG
Defendant:
WALMART, INC., DBA Walmart Supercenter #378 and WALMART DE
Bernard Howard v. Dale Collins, et al
as 24-1079
Plaintiff:
BERNARD HOWARD
Defendant:
REGINALD HARVEL, DALE COLLINS, WILLIAM RICE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Simms et al v. Prince George's Community Federal Credit Union et al
as 8:2023cv02771
Plaintiff:
Gregory Simms, Jr. and Terri Hurston-Simms
Defendant:
Prince George's Community Federal Credit Union and Mylee Porter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Myles v. Wojcik et al
as 1:2023cv14280
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Myles
Defendant:
Anthony Wojcik, Robert Rutherford, Kevin McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Tomerlin v. Mesa
as 2:2023cv01755
Plaintiff:
Myles Leroy Tomerlin
Defendant:
Rosendo Mesa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-12474
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
