Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Carlus Haynes v. City of Orlando, et al
as 22-12516
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLUS LEANDRUS HAYNES
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF ORLANDO, MARTHA LEE LOMBARDY, O'CONNOR AND O'CONNOR, LLC and others
Haynes v. City of Orlando et al
as 6:2022cv00372
Plaintiff:
carlus haynes and Carlus L. Haynes
Defendant:
City of Orlando, Martha Lee Lombardy, O'connor and O'connor LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vazquez v. Walters et al
as 3:2020cv01761
Defendant:
Hon Christopher L. Garrett, Hon Meagan A. Flynn, Hon Thomas A. Balmer and others
Plaintiff:
Santiago Vazquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Liviz v. Supreme Court of the United State of America, et al
as 1:2018cv12620
Defendant:
Michigan Supreme Court, Louisiana Supreme Court, Kansas Supreme Court and others
Plaintiff:
Chief Jurist ilya Liviz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Henson v. Eher et al (PLR2)
as 2:2018cv00001
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Scott Henson
Defendant:
Micheal Eher, Morristown Hamblin Hospital, Nanny and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mariam Martinez v. Young Hall, et al
as 11-14096
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIAM MALONE COLETTE MARTINEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
YOUNG C. HALL, MARTHA LEE LOMBARDY and ANNA ARRIAGE
Martinez v. Hall et al
as 6:2011cv01212
Plaintiff:
Mariam Malone Colette Martinez
Defendant:
Young C. Hall, Martha Lee Lombardy and Anna Arriage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2010cv01997
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Martinez v. Lombardy
as 1:2010cv04089
Plaintiff:
Mariam Malone Colette Martinez
Defendant:
Martha Lee Lombardy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Albrecht v. DeMuniz et al
as 3:2007cv01212
Plaintiff:
Nikolaus Albrecht
Defendant:
Paul J. DeMuniz, Thomas A. Balmer, W. Michael Gillette and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
