Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Maw v. Kearl
as 23-4103
Plaintiff / Appellee: KERRY JASON MAW
Defendant / Appellant: TRAVIS KEARL, in his individual capacity
Defendant: LARRY LEWIS, in his individual capacity
Maw v. Kearl et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00080
Defendant: Larry Lewis and Travis Kearl
Plaintiff: Kerry Jason Maw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01402
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01405
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00572
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Wasim Ata Bey ex rel. v. J. W. Mitchell We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1634
Plaintiff - Appellant: WASIM ATA BEY EX REL ERICK SEALEY, an individual
Defendant - Appellee: J. W. MITCHELL, 1709 VSP an individual, DAVID A. PATRICK, 0304 YCSO an individual, THOMAS CHABOT, 5543 YCSO an individual and others
Wasim Ata Bey ex rel Erick Sealey v. Mitchell et al
as 4:2015cv00044
Plaintiff: Wasim Ata Bey ex rel Erick Sealey
Defendant: J.W. Mitchell, David A. Patrick, Thomas Chabot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2015cv60067
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-12623
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Tina Mawing v. PNGI Charles Town Gaming We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-1999
Plaintiff - Appellee: TINA MAWING and HORSEMEN'S BENEVOLENT PROTECTION ASSOCIATION
Defendant - Appellant: PNGI CHARLES TOWN GAMING, L.L.C., d/b/a Charles Town Races and Slots

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?