Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Carina Conerly, et al v. Sharif Tarpin, et al
as 23-15297
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARINA CONERLY, JAMES CONERLY, MARILYN TILLMAN-CONERLY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SHARIF R. TARPIN, KIANA TURNER, VEDA LYMOSE, AKA Veda Labeet, AKA Veda Sorrell and others
(PS) Conerly et al v. Tarpin et al
as 2:2022cv01525
Plaintiff:
Carina Conerly, Minor M.T., James Conerly and others
Defendant:
Sharif Tarpin, Kiana Turner, Veda Lymose and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Clark et al v. The City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2021cv04951
Plaintiff:
Timothy Clark and Melissa Clark
Defendant:
The City of Atlanta, Sgt. Clerence Tosh and Officer Gregory DuBose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-1954
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Timothy Clark, et al v. City of Atlanta, Georgia, et al
as 12-14392
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY CLARK and MELISSA CLARK, Individually and in her Capacity as Administrator of the Estate of Montellis Clark, deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF ATLANTA, GEORGIA, a Municipal Corporation of the State of Georgia, GREGORY DUBOSE, Individually and in his official capacity as a Police Officer of the City of Atlanta, CLARENCE M. TOSH, III, Individually and in his official capacity as a Police Officer of the City of Atlanta and others
Johnson v. City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv00781
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson
Defendant:
City of New York , Center for Animal Care and Control, Michael Bloomberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark et al v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2010cv02163
Plaintiff:
Timothy Clark and Melissa Clark
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Gregory DuBose, Clarence M. Tosh, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
