Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Tennessee Equality Project Foundation, Inc. v. The City of Murfreesboro, Tennessee et al
as 3:2023cv01044
Plaintiff:
Tennessee Equality Project Foundation, Inc.
Defendant:
The City of Murfreesboro, Tennessee, The City Council of Murfreesboro, Tennessee, Shane McFarland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hicks et al v. Cantrell et al
as 3:2022cv00746
Plaintiff:
Grant Hicks, Tristan Nixon and Lucas Mario Nutt
Defendant:
Wesley Cantrell, Jonathan Fenoy, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Mullins v. City of Murfreesboro, et al.
as 3:2021cv00208
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, Officer Bill Doe, Chief Michael Bowen and others
Plaintiff:
Tina Mullins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00148
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00978
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Bowen v. The City of Oakland et al
as 4:2019cv01089
Defendant:
Libby Schaaf, Dept. of Public Works, Joe Devries and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Bowen and Michael Lawrence Bowen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowen v. Neves, et. al.
as 2:2011cv02365
Plaintiff:
Burch Michael Bowen
Defendant:
Jeff Neves, Gary Parker, Steven Coburn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowen v. Neves et al
as 2:2011at01271
Plaintiff:
Burch Michael Bowen
Defendant:
Jeff Neves, Gary Parker, Steven Coburn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barton v. City of Harvey et al
as 1:2008cv04510
Plaintiff:
Jackie Barton
Defendant:
City of Harvey, City of Harvey, City of Harvey and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
