Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03211
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Mission Inn et al
as 2:2024cv00553
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Defendant:
Mission Inn, Mission Motel, Rochester Zen Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00394
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Cuara R. v. Cayman National Bank et al
as 2:2023cv00669
Plaintiff:
Constantino Cuara R.
Defendant:
Cayman National Bank, Scotiabank Cayman Islands, HSBC Bermuda Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01619
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv61638
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01748
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Race Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-5030
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Clement v. Mitsubishi Financial Group
as 1:2022cv03387
Plaintiff:
Barton L. Clement
Defendant:
Mitsubishi Financial Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anthony Testa v. DOJ, et al
as 22-2478
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY J. TESTA
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, THOMSON-REUTERS & SUBSIDIARIES, THOMSON-REUTERS HOLDINGS INC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
