Cases 1 - 10 of 12
OIC Dreams Greene County IV Inc v. Benison
as 7:2023cv01297
Plaintiff:
OIC Dreams Greene County IV Inc
Defendant:
Sheriff Jonathan Benison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv61479
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0451 Employment Discrimination
FELICIANO v. MURPHY et al
as 2:2022cv04389
Plaintiff:
BASTAZAR FELICIANO
Defendant:
JUDGE MARGARET THERESA MURPHY, SUPERVISORY OFFICER OIC-CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT, PHILADELPHIA COUNTY and OIC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Armstrong v. City of Rocky Mount et al
as 5:2020cv00332
Plaintiff:
Arthur O. Armstrong
Defendant:
OIC Medical Center and City of Rocky Mount
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herbert v. The Housing Deputy et al
as 0:2018cv61281
Plaintiff:
Michael Travon Herbert
Defendant:
The Housing Deputy, The Floor Deputy, The Sergeant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herbert v. The Housing Deputy et al
as 0:2018cv61278
Plaintiff:
Michael Travon Herbert
Defendant:
The Housing Deputy, The Floor Deputy, The Sergeant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Juan Diaz v. City of Hialeah, et al
as 17-15438
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUAN DIAZ
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF HIALEAH, municipality, FRANK KASTANEDA, OIC #1, JOEL MEGO, Crew #2 and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv06202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OIC v. Bexar County Appraisal District et al
as 5:2016cv00208
Defendant:
Bexar County, Bexar County Appraisal District and Bexar County Sheriff's Office
Plaintiff:
OIC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
