Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
JOHNSON v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2023cv02257
Plaintiff:
ASHTON JOHNSON
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, FRANKIE PIMENTAL, ANGELICA KRUPA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03705
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
BTRI Sakonnet Blvd Investments, LLC et al v. The Town of Narragansett et al
as 1:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
BTRI Sakonnet Blvd Investments, LLC, Nine Exeter, LLC, John M. Rainaldi and others
Defendant:
The Town of Narragansett, Wayne R. Pimental, David Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PIMENTAL v. SOTO
as 2:2022cv06712
Plaintiff:
KEYRIS PIMENTAL
Defendant:
FRANKLIN G. SOTO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barr v. Denmark et al
as 1:2022cv20521
Plaintiff:
Janet Barr
Defendant:
Detective David Denmark, Detective Nirso Pimental, Detective Daniel Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Choudhry v. Tulare County et al
as 2:2021at00789
Plaintiff:
Mahwish Choudhry
Defendant:
Tulare County, Michael Boudreaux, Pimental Officer FNU and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Choudhry v. Tulare County et al
as 1:2021cv01287
Plaintiff:
Mahwish Choudhry
Defendant:
Tulare County, Michael Boudreaux, Officer FNU Pimental and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pimental v. Rivera et al
as 1:2019cv01088
Plaintiff:
Cesar Pimental
Defendant:
Mark Carrillo and Alfred Rivera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
