Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00422
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Madsen et al v. City of Lincoln et al
as 4:2021cv03075
Defendant:
Jeffrey Bliemeister, City of Lincoln, Patricia D. Lopez and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Madsen and Madsen Bowling and Billiard Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. Nebraska State Lottery et al
as 8:2020cv00127
Plaintiff:
Patricia Ann Sanchez
Defendant:
Nebraska State Lottery and Iowa State Lottery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis et al v. The United States et al
as 8:2019cv00501
Plaintiff:
Joanna Larue Ellis and Patricia Ellis-Swanson
Defendant:
The United States and U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv00017
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv00016
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Jensen v. County of York et al
as 4:2016cv03002
Defendant:
County of York, Does 1 - 10, Dale Radcliff and others
Plaintiff:
Patricia Jensen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Haltom v. Parks et al
as 8:2015cv00428
Defendant:
Stephanie Allison, Sharon Bartek, Marti Beard and others
Plaintiff:
John V. Haltom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Croghan v. Brunning et al
as 4:2014cv03238
Defendant:
Shannon Anderson, W. Mark Ashford, John Brunning and others
Plaintiff:
Dustin Dale Croghan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv03154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
