Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Peterson v. Tillis et al
as 1:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Penny Peterson
Defendant:
Thom Tillis and Ted Budd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Etienne v. Sanders et al
as 5:2023cv00214
Respondent:
KAREN REA PERKINS, MACHELLE SANDERS, TAMMIE ELAINE HALL and others
Petitioner:
DINEEN CHERYLANN ETIENNE
Defendant:
Reserve at Carrington Place
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Porter v. Board of Trustees of North Carolina State University et al
as 5:2021cv00365
Plaintiff:
Stephen R. Porter
Defendant:
Board of Trustees of North Carolina State University, Mr. W. Randolph Woodson, Mary Ann Danowitz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Angelo et al v. Gaston County Board of Education et al
as 3:2020cv00228
Plaintiff:
Kahlyzjah Mills, Angelo Cason and Kayden Gibson
Defendant:
Gaston County Board of Education and Penny Pope Barker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1322
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00519
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00896
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
BAGWELL v. DIMON et al
as 1:2014cv00495
Plaintiff:
DONALD RICHARD: BAGWELL
Defendant:
JAMIE DIMON , MARIANNE A. LAKE , GRADY I. INGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pisano et al v. Bartlett et al
as 3:2012cv00192
Plaintiff:
Al Pisano , North Carolina Constitution Party , North Carolina Green Party and others
Defendant:
Gary O. Bartlett , Larry Leake , Robert Cordle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
