Cases 1 - 10 of 1,107
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00820
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00798
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv22005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80546
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Cheron Hayes v. Disney Parks, Experiences and Products, Inc., et al
as 24-11229
Plaintiff:
CHERON HAYES
Defendant:
DISNEY PARKS, EXPERIENCES AND PRODUCTS, INC. and DISNEY GIFT CARD SERVICES, INC.
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Prince Ellis, et al v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 24-1652
Plaintiff:
PRINCE R. ELLIS, MICKEY M ELLIS and VERONA E.T. ELLIS
Defendant:
MINDY POSOFF, Managing Director, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, COMPTROLLER PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and others
Seth Schmidt v. Disney Parks, Experiences and Products, Inc., et al
as 24-11160
Plaintiff:
SETH SCHMIDT
Defendant:
DISNEY PARKS, EXPERIENCES AND PRODUCTS, INC., WALT DISNEY PARKS AND RESORTS U.S. INC and REEDY CREEK IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
