Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02875
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miscellaneou:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Person v. Roach et al
as 2:2014cv02788
Defendant:
Ashley Roach , Lauderdale County , The City Of Ripley and others
Plaintiff:
Earma Person
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robbins v. Smith et al
as 1:2013cv00705
Plaintiff:
John James Robbins
Defendant:
Jeffrey Allen Smith, Steve Evens, Clinton J. Walters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harrison v. Lauderdale County Sheriff's Department
as 2:2012cv02101
Plaintiff:
Walter Daniel Harrison
Defendant:
Lauderdale County Sheriff's Department
Miscellaneou:
Richard Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Sastre v. Kiehl's Since 1851, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv07793
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Sastre
Defendant:
Kiehl's Since 1851, LLC, Richard Jennings, Oven Kiley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Anthony Martin v. Daniel Royse, et al
as 10-2770
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY C. MARTIN
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL ROYSE, RICHARD JENNINGS, DAVID TINSLEY and others
Jennings et al v. City of Smithville, Tennessee
as 2:2009cv00117
Plaintiff:
Richard Jennings and June Jennings
Defendant:
City of Smithville, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jennings v. Department of Justice et al
as 3:2008cv05518
Plaintiff:
Richard Jennings
Defendant:
Department of Justice and United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Martin v. York et al
as 1:2008cv00246
Plaintiff:
Anthony C Martin
Defendant:
Rusty York, Daniel Royse, Richard Jennings and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jennings v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 4:2008cv04652
Plaintiff:
Richard Jennings
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice and United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
