Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Smith v. Ivey et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Bob Riley, John Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Kidd v. The City of Monroeville et al
as 1:2022cv00388
Plaintiff:
Roy Riley Kidd, III
Defendant:
The City of Monroeville and Michael Gibson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Taylor v. Yellen et al
as 2:2022cv00596
Plaintiff:
Rita D Taylor
Defendant:
Janet Yellen, Mark B Garland, Paula McCormack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Collings et al v Marshall County, Alabama et al
as 4:2021cv00707
Defendant:
James Dee Walker, Timothy Allen Jolley, Albertville City, Alabama and others
Plaintiff:
J Monroe Johnson and Eujena Rogers Collings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Collings v. Marshall County, Alabama et al
as 4:2021cv00655
Defendant:
James Dee Walker, Timothy Allen Jolley, Mitchell Scott Floyd and others
Plaintiff:
Eujena Rogers Collings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Marshall County Alabama et al
as 4:2021cv00519
Defendant:
James Dee Walker, Marshall County Alabama, Timothy Allen Jolley and others
Plaintiff:
J Monroe Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nute v. Tyson et al
as 4:2020cv01920
Defendant:
Christopher Zito, Leah Hitchcock Braswell, Christina Corona and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony David Nute
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
