Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2015cv10165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Friedman v. United Health and Life Insurance Company et al
as 8:2015cv00137
402) 934-9903 (fax:
Bruce Richard Friedman
Defendant:
Lineage Logistics, LLC, Millard Referigerated Services, LLC, OptumRX, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Waldrop, et al v. NM Human Services Dept., et al
as 15-2057
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOHN WALDROP, KARIN WALDROP, as parents and legal guardians of B.W., ARC OF NEW MEXICO, as legal guardians and next friends of S.K. and L.D. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
NEW MEXICO HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENT, NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, SIDONIE SQUIER, Secretary, New Mexico Human Services Department, in her official capacity and others
Friedman v. Brott et al
as 8:2015cv00109
Defendant:
Mr. Jonathan Brott, Lineage Logistics, LLC, Millard Refrigerated Services, LLC and others
402) 934-9903 (fax:
Bruce Richard Friedman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Robinson v. Islam et al
as 1:2015cv01526
Plaintiff:
Tiffany M. Robinson
Defendant:
Islam, MDS, Richard Friedman and Adjudication Division, Appeals Unit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Waldrop, et al v. New Mexico Human Services Department et al
as 1:2014cv00047
Defendant:
New Mexico Human Services Department, New Mexico Department of Health, Sidonie Squier and others
Plaintiff:
John Waldrop , Karin Waldrop , Arc of New Mexico and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2009cv07766
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Kosman v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2007cv00799
Plaintiff:
John K Kosman
Defendant:
Joseph M. Arpaio, Richard Friedman, A Venkatabalajai and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
