Cases 1 - 10 of 35
FOP Lodge 59 et al v. Rivera et al
as 2:2023cv00133
Plaintiff:
FOP LODGE 59, BRANDON HOLZHAUER and John Richmond
Defendant:
Jose Rivera, CITY OF EAST CHICAGO and East Chicago City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NAPIER v. RICHMOND POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2023cv00297
Plaintiff:
JAMES BLAKE NAPIER
Defendant:
RICHMOND POLICE DEPARTMENT, WILLIAM HAMPTON, KAYLA REICHNET and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 FMLA:Family and Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Bowes-Northern v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA et al
as 3:2021cv00803
Plaintiff:
Shedrick Bowes-Northern
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank NA, Jamie Dimon and Crystal Richmond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bowes-Northern v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA et al
as 2:2021cv00315
Plaintiff:
Shedrick Bowes-Northern
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank NA, Jamie Dimon and Crystal Richmond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BOWES-NORTHERN v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. et al
as 1:2021cv02574
Plaintiff:
SHEDRICK BOWES-NORTHERN
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., JAMIE DIMON and CRYSTAL RICHMOND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cr
BEACH v. BENEDICT et al
as 1:2021cv01406
Plaintiff:
CURTIS W. BEACH
Defendant:
DANNY BARRON, AMY MILLER, DONALD BENEDICT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02963
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
MAUL v. RICHMOND STATE OF INDIANA HOSPITAL, ET AL
as 1:2020cv02338
Defendant:
YOUNG, CHRIS R MD and RICHMOND STATE OF INDIANA HOSPITAL
Plaintiff:
RICHARD E. MAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
