Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01947
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Federoff et al v. Geisinger Clinic et al
as 4:2021cv01903
Plaintiff:
Theodore Federoff, Christine Baron, Melissa Barron and others
Defendant:
Geisinger Clinic, Geisinger Medical Center, Geisinger Health Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROMANOWSKI v. JONES et al
as 2:2020cv01911
Defendant:
JANE DOES 3-50, MARY JONES, JOHN DOES 3-50 and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD J. ROMANOWSKI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GIFFEN et al v. BOROUGH OF FLEMINGTON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION et al
as 3:2019cv18454
Defendant:
JEFFREY KLEIN, CONSTRUCTION OFFICIAL OF FLEMINGTON BOROUGH, JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 5, BOROUGH OF FLEMINGTON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE ECKELMANN, STEVEN ROMANOWSKI, GARY SCHOTLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hyman v. Lewis et al
as 2:2019cv11821
Defendant:
Rochelle Phipps, City of Detroit, Detroit Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Veronica Hyman
MILLER v. City of Detroit et al
as 2:2018cv13147
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH MILLER
Defendant:
Warden Kenneth Romanowski, City of Detroit and John and Jane Doe, Corrections Officers 1-8
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00420
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jerry McNeely v. Ronald Courtley, et al
as 14-1843
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY WAYNE MCNEELY
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD COURTLEY, THOMPSON, Sergeant, HODGSON, Trooper and others
McNeely v. Courtley et al
as 2:2013cv13790
Plaintiff:
Jerry Wayne McNeely
Defendant:
Ronald Courtley, Thompson, Hodgson and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
