Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Marble v. Forrest General Hospital et al
as 2:2023cv00074
Plaintiff:
Salinas Marble
Defendant:
Forrest General Hospital, Dr. John Doe, Nurse Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shaw v. Dart et al
as 1:2022cv00439
Plaintiff:
Corey Shaw and Corey Joseph A. Shaw
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Erin Stokes, Jacob Otto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
FLANDERS v. CAMDEN COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2018cv12857
Defendant:
SHERIFFS DEPUTY T. NICHOLS, JOHN DOE (SHERIFF UNKNOWN) and CAMDEN COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff:
BRIAN FLANDERS and KINDRA O'BRYANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charlotte Taylor v. Palm Beach County Sheriff, et al
as 16-15365
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLOTTE TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee:
PALM BEACH COUNTY SHERIFF, ED JABLONSKI, For Palm Beach County Sheriff, SCOTT SCHWAB and others
:
SERVICE
Charlotte Taylor v. Ric Bradshaw, et al
as 15-15027
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLOTTE TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee:
RIC L. BRADSHAW, Palm Beach County Sheriff, ED JABLONSKI, For Palm Beach County Sheriff, SCOTT SCHWAB, For Palm Beach County Sheriff and others
:
SERVICE
Greg Dugas v. Rogue Government Agents etc., et al
as 10-1622
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Greg Lee Dugas
Defendant - Appellee:
Rogue Government Agents and Agencies, Systematically Abusing the Patriot Act as a Pretext for Paramilitary Buildup on American Soil and to Violate the Enemy Combatant Doctrine, Mike Bone, Carter County Sheriff's Deputy, Unknown Agents, employed with the Southeast Missouri Drug Task Force and others
Marchiafava, et al v. Barnett, et al
as 3:2000cv00111
Plaintiff:
Mark E Marchiafava, Nicole Bean, Linda Glaviano and others
Defendant:
Cheif Criminal Deput Michael R Barnett, Sheriff Elmer Litchfield, Deputy Sheriff Unknown Callender and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
