Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Murarik v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv00242
Petitioner:
JODY MURARIK
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Fraser Blake, Scott Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Murarik v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2023cv01364
Plaintiff:
Jody Murarik
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Fraser Blake, Scott Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
White v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 1:2017cv08548
Plaintiff:
Hayes White
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. , Monterrey Security Consultants, Inc., Adrian Santos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sinclair et al v. Carter et al
as 1:2016cv04416
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Sinclair , Jonathan Sinclair and Eric Lundy
Defendant:
Scott Carter, Bryan Harris and City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spradley v. Carter et al
as 3:2009cv03071
Plaintiff:
John Spradley
Defendant:
Scott Carter, Scott McCarthur, Peter Richard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darren Thomas, et al v. Los Angeles County, et al
as 09-55297
Plaintiff:
DARREN THOMAS, JESUS AVILA, ERNESTO AVILA and others
Defendant - Appellee:
LOS ANGELES COUNTY, a public entity, LOS ANGELES SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, a public entity, CITY OF LYNWOOD, a public entity & a municipal corporation and others
Plaintiff-intervenor - Appellant:
FREDDIE FUIAVA
Carter v. City of Post Falls, Idaho et al
as 2:2008cv00488
Plaintiff:
Scott Carter and Scott Carter
Defendant:
City of Post Falls, Idaho, City of Post Falls, Idaho Police Department, Clay Larkin and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv06974
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
