Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00673
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Allen v. Marcotte et al
as 1:2023cv00699
Plaintiff:
Shawn Allen
Defendant:
Jason Marcotte, Danyelle Marts, Lindsay Strong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181 American With Disabilities Act (ADA)
STERLING HEIGHTS HOTELS, LLC v. CITY OF STERLING HEIGHTS et al
as 2:2020cv13116
Defendant:
CITY OF STERLING HEIGHTS, SHAWN ALLEN and MARK VANDERPOOL
Plaintiff:
STERLING HEIGHTS HOTELS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. County of Contra Costa, et al.
as 3:2020cv04160
Plaintiff:
Michael Geary Wilson
Defendant:
County of Contra Costa, City of Concord, Deborah A. Cooksey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allen v. Reuter et al
as 1:2019cv02719
Defendant:
Ron Tilton, Tristan Dumabok, Ron Reuter and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cr
Allen v. GEO Group Inc., The et al
as 1:2019cv00141
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc., The and Cheyenne Mt. Re-Entry Center
Plaintiff:
Shawn Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Moran v. City of New York
as 12-4583
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Matthew Moran, Megan Cox, Michelle Borok and others
Defendant - Appellant:
City of New York, John and Jane Does, Police Officers 1-50, individually and in their official capacities, Shawn Allen, Police Officer and others
Roberts v. Choate Construction Company, Inc. et al
as 5:2011cv00120
Plaintiff:
William Gregory Roberts
Defendant:
Choate Construction Company, Inc. , Shawn Allen, John W. Alden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tobis v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2007cv07741
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Tobis
Defendant:
The City of New York, Michael Bloomberg, Raymond Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
