Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Iglesia Bautista Alpha Omega Baptist Church et al
as 2:2024cv06833
Defendant:
Balam Tattoo Studio, Balam Window Tint, Private Collection Motors Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Lau et al v. Wokumi et al
as 1:2023cv02438
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Lau, Joseph Barton and Jose Mercado
Defendant:
Wokumi, Tokyo Ichiban Foods, Wagamama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Said v. Egyptian Ministry of Interior, et al
as 8:2022cv01532
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Fathy Said
Defendant:
Egyptian Ministry of Interior, Egyptian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Egyptian Embassy in Washington D.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Said et al v. Egyptian Embassy et al
as 8:2022cv01498
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Fathy Said and N.E.S.
Defendant:
Egyptian Embassy, Egyptian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Egyptian Ministry of Interior and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00431
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv03533
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv01663
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
