Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00729
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02651
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Boice v. Francoise
as 1:2026cv04218
Plaintiff:
James Boice
Defendant:
Steven Eddy Francoise
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00916
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Johnson v. Horton et al
as 4:2026cv00916
Plaintiff:
Steven Johnson
Defendant:
Kirk Horton, William Norris, Billy Kenyon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Horton et al
as 7:2026cv00083
Plaintiff:
Steven Johnson
Defendant:
Kirk Horton, William Norris, Billy Kenyon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stanford v. Bannick
as 4:2026cv00748
Plaintiff:
Chris Stanford
Defendant:
Steven Bannick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Ford v. The Florida Bar et al
as 3:2026cv01875
Plaintiff:
Roderick Andrew Lee Ford
Defendant:
The Florida Bar, Joshua A. Doyle, Patricia Ann Toro Savitz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Keshuna Abcumby v. MDOC, et al
as 26-1622
Plaintiff:
KESHUNA ABCUMBY
Defendant:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director, Michigan Department of Corrections, STEVEN ADAMSON, Special Activities Coordinator, Michigan Department of Corrections and others
Collymore v. Corrections Officer Beauvais et al
as 1:2026cv13359
Plaintiff:
Steven Collymore
Defendant:
Corrections Officer Beauvais, Suffolk County Sheriffs Department and Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: JS 44 Sec. IV - no matching citation currently in database
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
