Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Williams v. Pulaski, County of et al
as 4:2023cv01169
Plaintiff:
Khakeem Marquis Williams
Defendant:
Pulaski, County of, Eric Higgins, Mark Swaggerty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv04115
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Hollingsworth et al
as 6:2015cv06051
Plaintiff:
Tireshia Moore
Defendant:
Ed Hollingsworth, H. Dixon, Christopher Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Morneau v. Sims et al
as 4:2012cv04109
Defendant:
Mark D Sims , James Wolfe , Jackie Runion and others
Plaintiff:
Sandra Kellogg Morneau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cameron v. Stovall
as 4:2011cv04038
Plaintiff:
Beverly Cameron
Defendant:
Ron Stovall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv04006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Merchant v. Miller County, Arkansas et al
as 4:2009cv04136
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Jean Merchant
Defendant:
Miller County, Arkansas, H L Phillips, Linda Rambo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Paragould Arkansas, City of v. Watkins et al
as 3:2009cv00172
Counter Defendant:
Paragould Arkansas, City of
Counter Claimant:
Connie Burns Watkins and Richard Watkins
ThirdParty Defendant:
Paragould Arkansas, City of, Mike Gaskill, J D Stephenson and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Connie Burns Watkins and Richard Watkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2009cv06009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2008cv06005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
