Civil Rights Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 25
WALKER v. NOWASKOWSKI et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv02291
Plaintiff: DONALD R. WALKER
Defendant: RICHARD R. NOWASKOWSKI, MARK R. STETZEL, JENNIFER K. BARTEK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 dp
PUGH v. COBB et al
as 2:2021cv00256
Defendant: TED ROBERTSON and T.A COBB
Plaintiff: MATTHEW BRYANT PUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PUGH v. COBB et al
as 3:2021cv00094
Defendant: TED ROBERTSON and T.A COBB
Plaintiff: MATTHEW BRYANT PUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIRCKS et al v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00451
Defendant: RICHARD PAYNE, JEFFREY KELLER, BENNII WELDY and others
Plaintiff: KATHRYN DIRCKS and BARRY DIRCKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. MAYOR et al
as 1:2020cv01804
Defendant: MAYOR, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, JON B KING, CHIEF, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff: TED BELCHER JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Townsend v. Hughes et al
as 1:2017cv00437
Plaintiff: Jason Townsend
Defendant: Timothy Hughes, James Arnold, Ted Butz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARRINGTON v. CITY OF KOKOMO et al
as 1:2017cv01539
Plaintiff: EMMANUEL ARRINGTON
Defendant: CITY OF KOKOMO, JEREMY DODD and TED SECREASE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00418
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv03155
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MILLER v. WHEELER et al
as 3:2016cv00058
Defendant: MATT BAI, LARRY BUSCHON, TOM CIBROWSKI and others
Plaintiff: JESHA DONALDSON MILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?