Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00355
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00425
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00203
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OWENS v. UNITED STATES PROBATION DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2020cv00630
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OFJUSTICE and UNITED STATES PROBATION DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP A. OWENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Department of Justice et al
as 3:2020cv00281
Defendant:
Brian Rymil, Department of Justice, Jennifer Lynn Dillon and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory D. Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Melvin v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 5:2018cv00481
Defendant:
Archie McLaughlin, Sharon C. Wilson and United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Plaintiff:
Pamela Melvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
ASHBY et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE et al
as 1:2018cv00614
Plaintiff:
JHONIER ALONSO ROJAS HERRERA and SHON ASHBY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, CARL RISCH, STACEY I. YOUNG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Justice v. United States Department of Agriculture
as 5:2018cv00187
Petitioner:
Theodore Justice
Respondent:
United States Department of Agriculture
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harper v. Reid et al
as 5:2016cv00706
Plaintiff:
Montorey Danyell Harper
Defendant:
Harry M. Reid, Barrack H. Obama, United States Senate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00238
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
