Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Walker v. Campbell et al
as 2:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Mose Walker
Defendant:
Robbin A Campbell, JR, Marco McClendon and West Memphis City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv05126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Morgan v. Phillips et al
as 4:2023cv04063
Plaintiff:
Dr. Nina M. Morgan
Defendant:
Dana Phillips, Chief Deputy Cody Hensley, Sergeant Kristopher Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 Petition for Removal - Civil Rights
Walker v. Sharp County, Arkansas et al
as 3:2023cv00112
Plaintiff:
Amber Walker
Defendant:
Sharp County, Arkansas, Stephen Davis, Mark A Counts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Stinson v. Cauley et al
as 2:2022cv00219
Plaintiff:
Mark T Stinson, Sr
Defendant:
K Cauley, Hall, Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Walker v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 4:2022cv00637
Plaintiff:
Valerie A Walker
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, Arkansas State Police, Arkansas State Highway & Transportation Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00450
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00449
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00445
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
