Cases 1 - 9 of 9
232 West Mason LLC v. Jackson, City of, et al
as 5:2024cv11051
Plaintiff:
232 W MASON LLC
Defendant:
City of Jackson, a municipal corporation, Matthew Hagerty, Mark M. Porterfield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 Individuals With Disabilities Education Act
903 West Washington LLC et al v. City of Jackson, a municipal corporation et al
as 2:2022cv11110
Plaintiff:
903 West Washington LLC, 207 Second Street LLC and 321 West Mason LLC
Defendant:
City of Jackson, a municipal corporation, Matthew Hagerty, MARK M. PORTERFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams et al v. City of Jackson, a municipal corporation et al
as 3:2021cv10749
Defendant:
Matthew Hagerty, Gilbert Carlson, Bethany M Smith, City Attorney, an individual and others
Plaintiff:
Yellow House LLC, Accrual Investments LLC, 1604 LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv04837
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00564
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kemppainen v. Aransas County Detention Center et al
as 2:2014cv00420
Plaintiff:
Gordon Kirk Kemppainen
Defendant:
Aransas County Detention Center , Burt Mills and William Mills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chesney v. Jackson, City of et al
as 2:2014cv11097
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Chesney
Defendant:
Jackson, City of , Paul Gross , Timothy Black and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00144
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
