Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Wah v. Vargas et al
as 1:2024cv03146
Plaintiff:
John Joseph Hop Wah
Defendant:
Javier E. Vargas, Antonolla Papaloo, Nicole Wint-Baksh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Warren v. CorrectHealth Clayton, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv03608
Plaintiff:
Quennel D. Warren
Defendant:
CorrectHealth Clayton, LLC, CorrectHealth, LLC, Millenia Medical Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv04056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Tillman v. Louis
as 23-963
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Cherell Tillman, on behalf of B.K.T. and A.N.L.
Defendant / Appellee:
William Louis and Sheriff Williams
Defendant:
Ella Esha, Martha Pollack, Abdula Greene and others
Roundtree-McCrorey et al v. State Treasurer Office et al
as 3:2022cv00455
Plaintiff:
Anjaknie Roundtree-McCrorey, Andrew McCrorey, Jr and Mattie P McCrorey
Defendant:
State Treasurer Office, City Hall, State Capital and others
Tillman v. Vargas et al
as 1:2021cv05161
Plaintiff:
Cherell Tillman
Defendant:
Havier Vargas, Ella Esha, Abdulh Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Tillman v. Vargas et al
as 1:2021cv07029
Plaintiff:
Cherell Tillman
Defendant:
Havier Vargas, Ella Esha, Abdulh Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tillman v. Louis et al
as 1:2021cv02131
Defendant:
Faith D. James, Dinah Gronda, Ella Esha and others
Plaintiff:
Cherell Tillman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv05785
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
