Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Czornyj v. Henderson et al
as 1:2022cv10069
Plaintiff:
Brian C. Czornyj
Defendant:
Andrew Henderson, Juan Xing and University of Pittsburgh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Katzovicz v. Great Wolfe Express et al
as 4:2022cv03239
Plaintiff:
Samuel Katzovicz, II
Defendant:
Great Wolfe Express, Wan Xing, Wang Ping and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04463
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05757
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Dockery-Cornilus v. Liao et al
as 4:2019cv02899
Plaintiff:
Aliciette Dockery-Cornilus
Defendant:
Wei Qiang Huang and Xing Yao Liao
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
LIU et al v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2018cv04900
Plaintiff:
LI HUA LIU, XUE XIU LIU, GUANG ZHONG LI and others
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00896
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00463
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Third_party_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Third_party_plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv04618
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
People of the State of Illinois et al v. Xing Ying Employment Agency et al
as 1:2015cv10235
Plaintiff:
People of the State of Illinois , Illinois Department of Labor and Lisa Madigan
Defendant:
Xing Ying Employment Agency , Zhu Ying Zhang , Jun Jin Cheung and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
