Cases 1 - 10 of 13
THOMPSON v. BROSS et al
as 1:2021cv00464
Defendant:
JOSEPH BROSS and PHILLIP YATES
Plaintiff:
DESTINY RAYE THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Yates v. Town of Wallace NC
as 7:2021cv00012
Plaintiff:
Jess Yates and Jesse G. Yates
Respondent:
Town of Wallace NC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Carter v. Pellicane et al
as 3:2019cv00104
Defendant:
Gregory Allyn Forest, Thomas Pellicane and Barbara Yates
Plaintiff:
Dianne Michele Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norton v. Columbus County Board of Elections et al
as 7:2019cv00008
Defendant:
Harold Fipps, Leslie Macrae Doless, Jr., Jerome McMillian and others
Plaintiff:
Calvin Tyrone Norton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yates v. Davis et al
as 4:2018cv00001
Plaintiff:
Molly Yates
Defendant:
Tyree Davis , Willie Tillery , Wes Tripp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00495
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
ASSA'AD-FALTAS v. CARTER et al
as 1:2014cv00678
Plaintiff:
MARIE-THERESE H. ASSA'AD-FALTAS, MD
Defendant:
TANDY CARTER, BARBARA JEAN BURNS, SARA HEATHER SAVITZ WEISS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOE #1 et al v. MCCRORY et al
as 1:2013cv00711
Defendant:
PAT MCCRORY, ROY A. COOPER, III, FRANK PARRISH and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE #1 , JOHN DOE #2 , JOHN DOE #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARTER v. ARCHDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2013cv00613
Plaintiff:
JAMES J. CARTER
Defendant:
ARCHDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT , DAVID JONES , CITY OF ARCHDALE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McNeish v. Big Sarge Bail Bonds Associates Inc., et al
as 5:2011cv00739
Plaintiff:
Anthony McNeish
Defendant:
Big Sarge Bail Bonds Associates Inc., Manley Yates and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
