Cases 91 - 100 of 150
Sara Otrusina v. Chris Crysler, et al
as 13-1297
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SARA OTRUSINA
Defendant:
CHRIS CRYSLER, Acting Deputy Warden, PATRICIA CARUSO, HEIDI WASHINGTON, Warden, and others
Defendant - Appellee:
TONYA WATSON
Anderson v. Gershman, Esq.
as 9:2013cv80018
Plaintiff:
Nicklous Travis Anderson
Defendant:
Robert Scott Gershman, Esq.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Gershman
as 9:2013cv80007
Plaintiff:
Nicklous Travis Anderson
Defendant:
Robert Scott Gershman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. USA
as 1:2012cv02095
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Robert Scott, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Pierce v. Sparkman et al
as 1:2012cv00226
Plaintiff:
Jairie T. Pierce, Jr.
Defendant:
Emmitt Sparkman, Mississippi Department of Corrections, Christopher Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Scott v. Kevin Chappell
as 12-56799
Petitioner - Appellee:
JAMES ROBERT SCOTT
Respondent - Appellant:
KEVIN CHAPPELL, Warden, California State Prison at San Quentin
Ashbey v. Dameo et al
as 2:2012cv01631
Plaintiff:
Robert Scott Ashbey
Defendant:
Anthony Dameo, Rick Marshall, Terry Rising and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ML v. Scott
as 2:2012cv02471
Plaintiff:
ML
Defendant:
Robert Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Koeningsmann et al
as 6:2012cv06393
Plaintiff:
Robert Scott
Defendant:
Carl Koeningsmann, M.D. and New York State Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferstl v. Thaler et al
as 6:2012cv00121
Petitioner:
Robert Scott Ferstl
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
Tony Samaniego, Director Rick Thaler and The Attorney General for the State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
