Cases 101 - 110 of 149
Joseph Laurensau v. Charles Pluck, et al
as 13-3940
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH LAURENSAU
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES PLUCK, CO I, RONALD YOURKIN, LYLE POZIVIAK, CO I and others
Louis Debose v. G. Janda, et al
as 13-56669
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUIS LOVELL DEBOSE
Defendant - Appellee:
G. J. JANDA, Chief Deputy Warden, J. KELLERMAN, Correctional Captain, R. DELA CRUZ, Correctional Lieutenant and others
Smith v. Williams et al
as 6:2013cv00069
Plaintiff:
Roy Mandell Smith
Defendant:
Stanley Williams, James Deal, James Donald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snowden v. Landry
as 3:2013cv02277
Plaintiff:
Konan Snowden
Defendant:
Garret Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Garret v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2013cv00223
Petitioner:
Andrew Emorris Garret
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Debose v. Janda et al
as 3:2013cv01005
Plaintiff:
Louis Lovell Debose
Defendant:
G. J. Janda, J. Kellerman, R. Dela Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jermen v. John et al
as 1:2012cv09183
Plaintiff:
Bates Jermen
Defendant:
Urena John, Baldwin Thomas, Andre Morfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILSON v. CLAYTON et al
as 3:2012cv06644
Plaintiff:
CHARLES WILSON
Defendant:
ROBERT CLAYTON and GARRET M.J.R. FALCO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Francis et al v. The United States of America et al
as 1:2012cv07516
Plaintiff:
Marion Francis, Anita Garret and Regina Lewis
Defendant:
The United States of America and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. Pererz et al
as 1:2012cv02539
Petitioner:
Marshaun Stewart
Respondent:
Christopher Pererz and Garret
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
